Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.454
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Ment Health ; 27(1)2024 Feb 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38350669

RESUMO

QUESTION: We examined the effect of study characteristics, risk of bias and publication bias on the efficacy of pharmacotherapy in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS: We conducted a systematic search of double-blinded, placebo-controlled, short-term RCTs with selective serotonergic reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or clomipramine. We performed a random-effect meta-analysis using change in the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) as the primary outcome. We performed meta-regression for risk of bias, intervention, sponsor status, number of trial arms, use of placebo run-in, dosing, publication year, age, severity, illness duration and gender distribution. Furthermore, we analysed publication bias using a Bayesian selection model. FINDINGS: We screened 3729 articles and included 21 studies, with 4102 participants. Meta-analysis showed an effect size of -0.59 (Hedges' G, 95% CI -0.73 to -0.46), equalling a 4.2-point reduction in the YBOCS compared with placebo. The most recent trial was performed in 2007 and most trials were at risk of bias. We found an indication for publication bias, and subsequent correction for this bias resulted in a depleted effect size. In our meta-regression, we found that high risk of bias was associated with a larger effect size. Clomipramine was more effective than SSRIs, even after correcting for risk of bias. After correction for multiple testing, other selected predictors were non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal superiority of clomipramine over SSRIs, even after adjusting for risk of bias. Effect sizes may be attenuated when considering publication bias and methodological rigour, emphasising the importance of robust studies to guide clinical utility of OCD pharmacotherapy. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023394924.


Assuntos
Clomipramina , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo , Humanos , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Viés de Publicação , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
2.
Am J Case Rep ; 24: e941534, 2023 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38100391

RESUMO

BACKGROUND We report the case of a 28-year-old man with comorbidity of OCD, PTSD, and DID responding to aripiprazole augmentation of clomipramine combined with psychoeducation and exposure and response prevention (ERP). CASE REPORT A 28-year-old, well-educated man presented with depression, obsessive thoughts, behavioral impulsivity, and suicidal thoughts/behavior. He was known to be stubborn and sensitive to criticism since childhood. The obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviors also started at an early age. He had 4 past psychiatric hospitalizations, mostly for dissociative episodes and bizarre behaviors, complicated with significant anxiety and distress from traumatic experiences during doctoral study. He had no-to-minimal responses to various psychotropics and traditional Chinese medicine. A thorough assessment showed he met the diagnostic criteria for OCD, PTSD, and DID. He was then treated with clomipramine in combination with aripiprazole, plus psychoeducation and exposure and response prevention (ERP). His anxiety and irritability significantly improved within 2 months and his obsessive thoughts faded away. At 6-month follow-up, the patient achieved clinical remission. One year later, he remained stable and reported having a normal life. CONCLUSIONS The case illustrates both how impairing the comorbidity of OCD, PTSD, and DID can be and how concurrent use of tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) clomipramine and partial dopamine agonist aripiprazole, together with psychoeducation and ERP, can improve outcomes when other treatment choices fail to be effective.


Assuntos
Transtorno Dissociativo de Identidade , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Aripiprazol/uso terapêutico , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Dissociativo de Identidade/complicações , Transtorno Dissociativo de Identidade/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/complicações
3.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 11: CD012729, 2023 11 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38014714

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A panic attack is a discrete period of fear or anxiety that has a rapid onset and reaches a peak within 10 minutes. The main symptoms involve bodily systems, such as racing heart, chest pain, sweating, shaking, dizziness, flushing, churning stomach, faintness and breathlessness. Other recognised panic attack symptoms involve fearful cognitions, such as the fear of collapse, going mad or dying, and derealisation (the sensation that the world is unreal). Panic disorder is common in the general population with a prevalence of 1% to 4%. The treatment of panic disorder includes psychological and pharmacological interventions, including antidepressants and benzodiazepines. OBJECTIVES: To compare, via network meta-analysis, individual drugs (antidepressants and benzodiazepines) or placebo in terms of efficacy and acceptability in the acute treatment of panic disorder, with or without agoraphobia. To rank individual active drugs for panic disorder (antidepressants, benzodiazepines and placebo) according to their effectiveness and acceptability. To rank drug classes for panic disorder (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), mono-amine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and benzodiazepines (BDZs) and placebo) according to their effectiveness and acceptability. To explore heterogeneity and inconsistency between direct and indirect evidence in a network meta-analysis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Specialised Register, CENTRAL, CDSR, MEDLINE, Ovid Embase and PsycINFO to 26 May 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of people aged 18 years or older of either sex and any ethnicity with clinically diagnosed panic disorder, with or without agoraphobia. We included trials that compared the effectiveness of antidepressants and benzodiazepines with each other or with a placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We analysed dichotomous data and continuous data as risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MD) or standardised mean differences (SMD): response to treatment (i.e. substantial improvement from baseline as defined by the original investigators: dichotomous outcome), total number of dropouts due to any reason (as a proxy measure of treatment acceptability: dichotomous outcome), remission (i.e. satisfactory end state as defined by global judgement of the original investigators: dichotomous outcome), panic symptom scales and global judgement (continuous outcome), frequency of panic attacks (as recorded, for example, by a panic diary; continuous outcome), agoraphobia (dichotomous outcome). We assessed the certainty of evidence using threshold analyses. MAIN RESULTS: Overall, we included 70 trials in this review. Sample sizes ranged between 5 and 445 participants in each arm, and the total sample size per study ranged from 10 to 1168. Thirty-five studies included sample sizes of over 100 participants. There is evidence from 48 RCTs (N = 10,118) that most medications are more effective in the response outcome than placebo. In particular, diazepam, alprazolam, clonazepam, paroxetine, venlafaxine, clomipramine, fluoxetine and adinazolam showed the strongest effect, with diazepam, alprazolam and clonazepam ranking as the most effective. We found heterogeneity in most of the comparisons, but our threshold analyses suggest that this is unlikely to impact the findings of the network meta-analysis. Results from 64 RCTs (N = 12,310) suggest that most medications are associated with either a reduced or similar risk of dropouts to placebo. Alprazolam and diazepam were associated with a lower dropout rate compared to placebo and were ranked as the most tolerated of all the medications examined. Thirty-two RCTs (N = 8569) were included in the remission outcome. Most medications were more effective than placebo, namely desipramine, fluoxetine, clonazepam, diazepam, fluvoxamine, imipramine, venlafaxine and paroxetine, and their effects were clinically meaningful. Amongst these medications, desipramine and alprazolam were ranked highest. Thirty-five RCTs (N = 8826) are included in the continuous outcome reduction in panic scale scores. Brofaromine, clonazepam and reboxetine had the strongest reductions in panic symptoms compared to placebo, but results were based on either one trial or very small trials. Forty-one RCTs (N = 7853) are included in the frequency of panic attack outcome. Only clonazepam and alprazolam showed a strong reduction in the frequency of panic attacks compared to placebo, and were ranked highest. Twenty-six RCTs (N = 7044) provided data for agoraphobia. The strongest reductions in agoraphobia symptoms were found for citalopram, reboxetine, escitalopram, clomipramine and diazepam, compared to placebo. For the pooled intervention classes, we examined the two primary outcomes (response and dropout). The classes of medication were: SSRIs, SNRIs, TCAs, MAOIs and BDZs. For the response outcome, all classes of medications examined were more effective than placebo. TCAs as a class ranked as the most effective, followed by BDZs and MAOIs. SSRIs as a class ranked fifth on average, while SNRIs were ranked lowest. When we compared classes of medication with each other for the response outcome, we found no difference between classes. Comparisons between MAOIs and TCAs and between BDZs and TCAs also suggested no differences between these medications, but the results were imprecise. For the dropout outcome, BDZs were the only class associated with a lower dropout compared to placebo and were ranked first in terms of tolerability. The other classes did not show any difference in dropouts compared to placebo. In terms of ranking, TCAs are on average second to BDZs, followed by SNRIs, then by SSRIs and lastly by MAOIs. BDZs were associated with lower dropout rates compared to SSRIs, SNRIs and TCAs. The quality of the studies comparing antidepressants with placebo was moderate, while the quality of the studies comparing BDZs with placebo and antidepressants was low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In terms of efficacy, SSRIs, SNRIs (venlafaxine), TCAs, MAOIs and BDZs may be effective, with little difference between classes. However, it is important to note that the reliability of these findings may be limited due to the overall low quality of the studies, with all having unclear or high risk of bias across multiple domains. Within classes, some differences emerged. For example, amongst the SSRIs paroxetine and fluoxetine seem to have stronger evidence of efficacy than sertraline. Benzodiazepines appear to have a small but significant advantage in terms of tolerability (incidence of dropouts) over other classes.


Assuntos
Transtorno de Pânico , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina , Adulto , Humanos , Transtorno de Pânico/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno de Pânico/complicações , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Paroxetina/uso terapêutico , Fluoxetina/uso terapêutico , Cloridrato de Venlafaxina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/uso terapêutico , Alprazolam/uso terapêutico , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Reboxetina/uso terapêutico , Clonazepam/uso terapêutico , Desipramina/uso terapêutico , Metanálise em Rede , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Antidepressivos Tricíclicos/uso terapêutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Diazepam/uso terapêutico
4.
Braz J Psychiatry ; 45(2): 146-161, 2023 May 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36749887

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To summarize evidence-based pharmacological treatments and provide guidance on clinical interventions for adult patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). METHODS: The American Psychiatric Association (APA) guidelines for the treatment of OCD (2013) were updated with a systematic review assessing the efficacy of pharmacological treatments for adult OCD, comprising monotherapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), clomipramine, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and augmentation strategies with clomipramine, antipsychotics, and glutamate-modulating agents. We searched for the literature published from 2013-2020 in five databases, considering the design of the study, primary outcome measures, types of publication, and language. Selected articles had their quality assessed with validated tools. Treatment recommendations were classified according to levels of evidence developed by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA). RESULTS: We examined 57 new studies to update the 2013 APA guidelines. High-quality evidence supports SSRIs for first-line pharmacological treatment of OCD. Moreover, augmentation of SSRIs with antipsychotics (risperidone, aripiprazole) is the most evidence-based pharmacological intervention for SSRI-resistant OCD. CONCLUSION: SSRIs, in the highest recommended or tolerable doses for 8-12 weeks, remain the first-line treatment for adult OCD. Optimal augmentation strategies for SSRI-resistant OCD include low doses of risperidone or aripiprazole. Pharmacological treatments considered ineffective or potentially harmful, such as monotherapy with antipsychotics or augmentation with ketamine, lamotrigine, or N-acetylcysteine, have also been detailed.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo , Humanos , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Aripiprazol/uso terapêutico , Risperidona , Brasil , Resultado do Tratamento , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/psicologia
5.
J Cutan Med Surg ; 27(2): 140-149, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36802832

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The lack of clinical guidelines for the treatment of primary psychodermatologic disorders (PPDs) hinders the delivery of optimal care to patients. The review aimed to identify, appraise, and summarize the currently available evidence about the safety and effectiveness of pharmacological management of PPDs through randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRIMSA) statement and the Global Evidence Mapping Initiative guidance were followed. Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Cochrane and Scopus were searched, and two reviewers independently completed article review, data extraction, and quality assessment. RESULTS: Among 2618 unique studies, full texts of 83 were reviewed and 21 RCTs were included. Five PDDs were identified: trichotillomania (n = 12), pathologic skin picking (n = 5), nail biting (n = 2), delusional parasitosis (n = 1), and dermatitis from compulsive hand washing (n = 1). Seven different classes of medications were investigated: SSRIs (i.e., fluoxetine, sertraline, and citalopram), tricyclic antidepressants (i.e., clomipramine and desipramine), antipsychotics (i.e., olanzapine and pimozide), anticonvulsant (i.e., lamotrigine), N-acetylcysteine, inositol, and milk thistle. RCT-derived evidence supports the use of antidepressants in trichotillomania (sertraline and clomipramine), pathologic skin picking (fluoxetine), pathologic nail biting and dermatitis from compulsive hand washing (clomipramine or desipramine); antipsychotics in trichotillomania (olanzapine) and delusional parasitosis (pimozide); N-acetyl cysteine in trichotillomania and skin picking. CONCLUSION: Few pharmacotherapies for primary psychodermatologic disorders are assessed through controlled trials in the literature. This review serves as a roadmap for researchers and clinicians to reach informed decisions with current evidence, and to build on it to establish guidelines in the future.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Dermatite , Humanos , Sertralina/uso terapêutico , Fluoxetina/uso terapêutico , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Olanzapina , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Desipramina , Pimozida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Acetilcisteína/uso terapêutico , Dermatite/tratamento farmacológico
6.
Psychiatr Clin North Am ; 46(1): 107-119, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36740347

RESUMO

Pharmacological treatment is a mainstay of the care of individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Robust evidence supports the use of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the older tricyclic drug clomipramine. Other antidepressants are less effective (or have been insufficiently studied). When first-line treatment with these agents, and with appropriate psychotherapy, is ineffective, several augmentation strategies are available, though their evidentiary support is weaker. A substantial minority of patients have persistent symptoms despite optimal evidence-based treatment. Further work and more treatment options are needed.


Assuntos
Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo , Humanos , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/tratamento farmacológico , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Psicoterapia
7.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 89(2): 737-750, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36103361

RESUMO

There is still limited knowledge about alterations of blood concentrations of psychotropic drugs during pregnancy, the transfer of psychotropic drugs into breastmilk and the effects on exposed children. We investigated changes in concentrations of psychopharmacological medication during pregnancy and lactation in serum and breastmilk at different time points in a naturalistic sample of 60 mothers and observed the development of the exposed children in the first 12 months. We found a decrease in serum concentrations from the first to the second trimester of amitriptyline, duloxetine, escitalopram, quetiapine and sertraline. Citalopram stayed rather stable during pregnancy, sertraline levels interestingly increased again from the second to the third trimester. High concentration-by-dose ratios in breastmilk were found for venlafaxine as well as lamotrigine, low for quetiapine and clomipramine. Similarly, clomipramine and quetiapine showed low milk/serum-penetration ratios. Regarding the birth outcome measures in children, we found no significant differences between in utero exposed compared to nonexposed newborns. There were no significant differences in the development in the first 12 months. Psychotropic medication in the peripartum needs a balancing of risks and benefits and a continuous therapeutic drug monitoring can be a guidance for clinicians to monitor drug alteration patterns, which are likely to occur due to physiological pregnancy-associated changes in pharmacokinetics. Accordingly, therapeutic drug monitoring can optimize a medication in pregnancy and lactation with the lowest effective dose.


Assuntos
Complicações na Gravidez , Sertralina , Gravidez , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Criança , Humanos , Sertralina/uso terapêutico , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapêutico , Psicotrópicos/efeitos adversos , Lactação , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico
8.
Pharmacogenomics J ; 23(1): 28-35, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36333412

RESUMO

Antidepressant medication is used extensively to treat bipolar depression despite uncertain efficacy. The cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 enzyme metabolize several antidepressants, and polymorphisms in the corresponding gene CYP2C19 influence plasma concentration and hence treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder. Here, we investigate if CYP2C19 polymorphisms are associated with antidepressant treatment patterns and the risk of mania when antidepressants are used in bipolar disorder. Two single nucleotide polymorphisms (rs4244285 and rs12248560) were used to classify 5019 bipolar disorder patients into CYP2C19 metabolic phenotypes ranging from poor to ultra-rapid metabolizers. We used Swedish national registry data 2005-2017 on dispensed medications and inpatient care to estimate risks for early-treatment persistence, treatment discontinuation, switching to a new antidepressant medication, and mania within 3 months of treatment initiation in patients treated with citalopram, escitalopram, sertraline, amitriptyline, and clomipramine. Metabolic phenotypes of CYP2C19 were not robustly associated with the investigated treatment outcomes based on dispense patterns. Slower metabolism was associated with an increased risk of treatment emergent mania for sertraline (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.04-1.62, p = 0.02) and the tricyclic antidepressants amitriptyline and clomipramine (HR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.05-2.02, p = 0.024). In a large study of the impact of CYP2C19 metabolic phenotypes on antidepressant treatment of bipolar depression, we found an association between slower CYP2C19 metabolism and higher risk of treatment emergent mania, which is a step towards personalized risk assessments. There were, however, no clear associations with early treatment persistence, treatment discontinuation, and switching to a new antidepressant.


Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar , Sistema Enzimático do Citocromo P-450 , Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Humanos , Amitriptilina/uso terapêutico , Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Bipolar/genética , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/genética , Sistema Enzimático do Citocromo P-450/genética , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Mania/induzido quimicamente , Mania/tratamento farmacológico , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único/genética , Sertralina
9.
Artigo em Português | LILACS, CONASS, Coleciona SUS, SES-GO | ID: biblio-1359809

RESUMO

Tecnologia: Duloxetina e outros antidepressivos disponíveis no Sistema Único de Saúde (amitriptilina, nortriptilina, clomipramina, fluoxetina e bupropiona). Indicação: Tratamento do primeiro episódio depressivo no transtorno de depressão maior em adultos. Pergunta: A duloxetina é mais eficaz e tolerável que a amitriptilina, nortriptilina, clomipramina, fluoxetina e bupropiona para o tratamento do primeiro episódio de depressão maior em adultos? Métodos: Revisão rápida de evidências (overview) de revisões sistemáticas, com levantamento bibliográfico realizado na base de dados PUBMED, utilizando estratégia estruturada de busca. A qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas foi avaliada com AMSTAR-2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews). Resultados: Foi selecionada 1 revisão sistemática, que atendia aos critérios de inclusão. Conclusão: Os antidepressivos, comparados ao placebo, tinham maior taxa de resposta, taxa de remissão e taxa de descontinuação devido a efeitos colaterais, no tratamento de curto prazo. Duloxetina tinha taxa de resposta similar a amitriptilina, clomipramina, fluoxetina e bupropiona. Duloxetina e amitriptilina tinham maior taxa de remissão que fluoxetina. Comparando-se as taxas de abandono de tratamento devido a efeitos colaterais, clomipramina era menos seguro, amitriptilina, bupropiona e duloxetina eram parecidos entre si, e fluoxetina era o antidepressivo mais seguro


Technology: Duloxetine and other antidepressants available in the Brazilian Public Health System (amitriptyline, nortriptyline, clomipramine, fluoxetine and bupropion). Indication: Treatment of the first depressive episode in adult major depressive disorder. Question: Is duloxetine more effective and tolerable than amitriptyline, nortriptyline, clomipramine, fluoxetine and bupropion for the treatment of first episode of major depression in adults? Methods: Rapid response review of evidence (overview) from systematic reviews, with a bibliographic search in the PUBMED database, using a structured strategy. The methodological quality of systematic reviews was assessed with AMSTAR-2 (Methodological Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews). Results: One systematic review was selected, which met the inclusion criteria. Conclusion: In short-term treatment, antidepressants, compared to placebo, had a higher rate of response, rate of remission and rate drop-out due to side effects. Duloxetine had a similar response rate to amitriptyline, clomipramine, fluoxetine and bupropion. Duloxetine and amitriptyline had higher remission rates than fluoxetine. Comparing rates of dropout due to side effects, clomipramine had the worst rates, amitriptyline, bupropion, and duloxetine were similar to each other, and fluoxetine had the better rates


Assuntos
Humanos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adulto Jovem , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Cloridrato de Duloxetina/uso terapêutico , Antidepressivos , Sistema Único de Saúde , Fluoxetina/uso terapêutico , Bupropiona/uso terapêutico , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Amitriptilina/uso terapêutico , Nortriptilina/uso terapêutico
10.
Artigo em Português | LILACS, CONASS, Coleciona SUS, SES-GO | ID: biblio-1367185

RESUMO

Lisdexanfetamina e drogas disponíveis no SUS (metilfenidato, bupropiona, amitriptilina, clomipramina, nortriptilina). Indicação: Transtorno do Déficit de Atenção e Hiperatividade (TDAH) em crianças e adolescentes. Pergunta: Lisdexanfetamina é eficaz e segura para melhoria de sintomática, comparada ao placebo e medicações disponíveis no SUS, no tratamento de crianças e adolescentes com TDAH? Métodos: Revisão rápida de evidências (overview) de revisões sistemáticas, com levantamento bibliográfico realizado na base de dados PUBMED, utilizando estratégia estruturada de busca. A qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas foi avaliada com AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews). Resultados: Foram selecionadas 3 revisões sistemáticas, que atenderam aos critérios de inclusão. Conclusão: Lisdexanfetamina e metilfenidato são mais eficazes que placebo, e similares entre si, para reduzir sintomas em escalas de avaliação. Lisdexanfetamina e metilfenidato têm risco similar ao placebo de abandono do tratamento devido a efeitos adversos. Bupropiona não é mais eficaz que placebo para alívio sintomático. Lisdexanfetamina tem efeitos adversos de redução do apetite e insônia/ dificuldades do sono. Não foram encontradas evidências na literatura sobre os efeitos terapêuticos de amitriptilina, clomipramina e nortriptilina no tratamento de crianças e adolescentes com TDAH


Lisdexamfetamine and drugs available in the Brazilian Public Health System (BPHS) (methylphenidate, bupropion, amitriptyline, clomipramine, nortriptyline, bupropion). Indication: Children and adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Question: Lisdexamfetamine is effective and safe for symptomatic improvement, compared to placebo and drugs available in the BPHS, for treatment of children and adolescents with ADHD? Methods: Rapid response review of evidence (overview) of systematic reviews, with bibliographic search in the PUBMED database, using a structured strategy. The methodological quality of systematic reviews was assessed with AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews). Results: 3 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria and were selected. Conclusion: Lisdexamfetamine and methylphenidate are more effective than placebo, and similar to each other, to reduce symptoms on rating scales. Lisdexamfetamine and methylphenidate are not different from placebo in the risk of treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects. Bupropion is no more effective than placebo for symptomatic relief. Lisdexamfetamine has adverse effects of decreased appetite and insomnia/sleep troubles. No evidence was found in the literature about therapeutic effects of amitriptyline, clomipramine and nortriptyline for treatment of children and adolescents with ADHD


Assuntos
Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/tratamento farmacológico , Bupropiona/uso terapêutico , Dimesilato de Lisdexanfetamina/uso terapêutico , Metilfenidato/uso terapêutico , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Placebos , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto , Amitriptilina/uso terapêutico , Nortriptilina/uso terapêutico
11.
Continuum (Minneap Minn) ; 27(6): 1764-1784, 2021 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34881735

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article describes the phenomenology and clinical presentation of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), a common but underdiagnosed psychiatric disorder. Guidance for effectively identifying obsessive-compulsive symptoms is provided, and treatment options, including psychotherapy, pharmacologic management, and neuromodulation approaches for treatment-resistant OCD, are discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: OCD affects 2% to 3% of adults worldwide and is associated with substantial individual disability and societal costs. Lack of recognition of common OCD symptom types, in addition to shame and fear of stigma on the part of patients, has created an average delay in diagnosis by almost 10 years and a delay in effective treatment (ie, a treatment gap) of nearly 2 years. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), specifically a form of CBT that includes a type of behavioral intervention called exposure and response prevention, remains the most effective form of treatment for OCD. If CBT is not effective or not available, pharmacologic treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or clomipramine, a nonselective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, can also be of benefit. Neuromodulation approaches such as deep brain stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation are rapidly emerging as effective treatments for OCD, particularly for patients who have not experienced an adequate response to psychotherapy or pharmacologic management. SUMMARY: OCD affects more than one in every 50 adults in the United States but is recognized and adequately treated in fewer than half of those affected. Early intervention and appropriate treatment can substantially reduce OCD symptom severity, improve quality of life, and minimize the functional disability associated with this chronic and often debilitating illness.


Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo , Adulto , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/diagnóstico , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
J Psychiatr Res ; 137: 319-327, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33744511

RESUMO

High doses of antidepressants, particularly clomipramine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), are the well-established treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but manic/hypomanic episodes are potential adverse events associated with this treatment. A systematic literature review was performed on manic/hypomanic episodes in non-bipolar OCD patients. Clinical, sociodemographic and antidepressant characteristics during the manic/hypomanic switch were extracted using descriptive statistics. Data were obtained from 20 case reports and case series. Switching episodes mostly appeared in the first 12 weeks after antidepressant initiation and took place more frequently during SSRI use (mostly fluoxetine) in 64.3% of cases. Clomipramine and SSRI use differed non-significantly between the switching episodes that appeared during the first 12 weeks of antidepressant treatment and the episodes that appeared beyond 12 weeks. Switching episodes emerging before 12 weeks were associated with a lower defined daily dose of antidepressants than episodes emerging after 12 weeks. These findings suggest that there are two independent characteristics involved in manic/hypomanic switch in OCD: a) they appeared most frequently with SSRI use (fluoxetine) regardless of the time of it use, and b) episodes appeared in the first 12 weeks after SSRI or clomipramine initiation had a lower dose of antidepressant than episodes appeared after 12 weeks.


Assuntos
Mania , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo , Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/efeitos adversos
14.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 21(12): 1455-1466, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32633577

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Currently conceptualized as an obsessive compulsive and related disorder, trichotillomania, or hair-pulling disorder, is a common illness that causes significant distress or functional impairments in various life domains. Most individuals with trichotillomania also have other comorbid diagnoses. Treating trichotillomania with pharmacotherapy is complicated since there are currently no FDA-approved drugs for its treatment. AREAS COVERED: The databases PubMed, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Evidence-based Medicine Reviews, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched, yielding a total of 10 open trials and 10 controlled trials selected. This review aims to examine pharmacotherapeutic options for the treatment of trichotillomania in adults and makes recommendations for the assessment and management of the disorder. EXPERT OPINION: There is preliminary evidence that clomipramine, olanzapine, and N-acetylcysteine may be effective in cases of trichotillomania, however, given the paucity of controlled studies with large sample sizes, decisions regarding the use of drugs should be made on a case-by-case basis taking into account the severity of trichotillomania and the nature of psychiatric comorbidity.


Assuntos
Acetilcisteína/uso terapêutico , Antidepressivos Tricíclicos/uso terapêutico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Olanzapina/uso terapêutico , Tricotilomania/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , Tricotilomania/epidemiologia , Tricotilomania/psicologia
15.
Depress Anxiety ; 37(8): 715-727, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32390221

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Trichotillomania (TTM) is a difficult-to-treat psychiatric condition with no first-line medications approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Individuals with TTM often feel that clinicians know little about this disorder. Here, we present an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining treatments for TTM. METHODS: Pubmed, PsychINFO, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched with the terms "Trichotillomania OR Hair Pulling Disorder" to identify randomized controlled clinical trials evaluating treatments for TTM. RESULTS: Twenty-four trials involving 26 comparisons and 857 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Behavioral therapy with habit-reversal training components (BT-HRT) demonstrated a large benefit compared to control conditions (standardized mean difference [SMD] [95% CI] = -1.22 [-1.71, -0.73], p < .0001) for improving TTM symptoms. Clomipramine (SMD [95% CI] = -0.71 [-1.38, -0.05], p = .036), N-acetylcysteine (SMD [95% CI] = -0.75 [-1.36, -0.13], p = .017) and olanzapine (SMD [95% CI] = -0.94 [-1.77, -0.12], p = .025) demonstrated significant benefits compared to placebo in RCTs. CONCLUSIONS: BT-HRT has demonstrated the largest treatment effects and has the strongest evidence base for reducing TTM symptoms. In contrast, several pharmacological agents have demonstrated efficacy in single randomized clinical trials that would benefit from replication. Additional trials are needed to identify other effective medications for TTM and determine the relative efficacy of available agents.


Assuntos
Tricotilomania , Acetilcisteína , Terapia Comportamental , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Tricotilomania/tratamento farmacológico
16.
Clin Neuropharmacol ; 43(3): 61-65, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32217864

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The treatment of Parkinson disease (PD) psychosis remains a challenge. Only a few treatments eliciting significant relief of psychotic symptoms have passed the test of randomized controlled trials. METHODS: Here, we conducted a review of the literature on the effect of antidepressants on PD psychosis. Because there is no randomized controlled trial that assessed the antipsychotic effects of antidepressants in PD, only case reports, case series, and open-label trials were available to review. Because of the scarce literature, statistical analysis could not be performed. RESULTS: The following antidepressants alleviated hallucinations in PD: amoxapine, citalopram, clomipramine, escitalopram, mianserin, mirtazapine, and venlafaxine. The antidepressants were generally well tolerated, with the exception of amoxapine, which exacerbated parkinsonism. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas the conclusions that can be drawn on the efficacy of antidepressants at reducing PD psychosis are limited because of the poor quality of the reported studies, it is encouraging to notice that there are positive anecdotal reports. Further studies are needed to confirm the potential of these drugs and also to determine if a subtype of patients or of psychotic features may be more likely to be improved by antidepressants.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Transtornos Psicóticos/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Amoxapina/uso terapêutico , Citalopram/uso terapêutico , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mianserina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mirtazapina/uso terapêutico , Doença de Parkinson/psicologia , Cloridrato de Venlafaxina/uso terapêutico
17.
Neuropsychiatr ; 34(1): 27-29, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31828741

RESUMO

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by repetitive, persistent and unwanted thoughts and ritualistic, repetitive behaviors. The pathophysiology of OCD involves many distinct cortical and subcortical regions and it has been reported that OCD may occur as a consequence of traumatic brain injury, infections and tumors as well as cerebrovascular insult such as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). We here describe the case of a 36-year-old woman who developed OCD at the age of 13 with almost complete remission of the symptoms after a 1 year-long treatment. Interestingly, after suffering CVST at the superior sagittal sinus at the age of 33, she experienced a relapse of OCD. The patient was successfully treated with Sertraline and Clomipramine. Previous studies revealed cases of OCD following different cerebrovascular accidents, i.e. predominantly arterial stroke. However, the present case is the first to describe OCD after venous thrombosis. Based on our clinical experience, the most effective treatment of OCD after CVST represents the combination of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor Sertraline and the tricyclic antidepressant Clomipramine.


Assuntos
Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/complicações , Trombose dos Seios Intracranianos/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva , Sertralina/uso terapêutico
18.
Psychiatry Res ; 281: 112583, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31600606

RESUMO

A previous algorithm for the pharmacological treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder was published in 2012. Developments over the past 7 years suggest an update is needed. The authors conducted searches in PubMed, focusing on new studies and reviews since 2012 that would support or change previous recommendations. We identified exceptions to the main algorithm, including pregnant women and women of child-bearing potential, the elderly, and patients with common medical and psychiatric co-morbidities. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are still first-line. An adequate trial requires a period at typical antidepressant doses and dose adjustments guided by a plasma level to evaluate for poor adherence or ultra-rapid metabolism. If the response is inadequate, consider a trial of another SSRI this time possibly taken to a very high dose. Clomipramine could be an alternative. If the response to the second trial remains inadequate, the next recommendation is to augment with aripiprazole or risperidone. Alternatively, augmentation with novel agents could be selected, including glutamatergic (memantine, riluzole, topiramate, n-acetylcysteine, lamotrigine), serotonergic (ondansetron), and anti-inflammatory (minocycline, celecoxib) agents. A third option could be transcranial magnetic stimulation. Lastly, after several of these trials, deep brain stimulation and cingulotomy have evidence for a role in the most treatment-refractory patients.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Aripiprazol/uso terapêutico , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/psicologia , Risperidona/uso terapêutico , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico
19.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 118: 109263, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31369988

RESUMO

It is well known that chamomile is one of the oldest known medicinal herbs and has been used to treat various disorders, but it is mainly German chamomile. The effects of Roman chamomile on depression still unclear. In this study, we used chronically stressed mice to investigate whether inhalation of Roman chamomile essential oil affects depression-like behavior. We previously reported that restraint and water immersion stress produce depression-like behavior and a blunted response to the tricyclic antidepressant clomipramine. Each mouse was exposed to restraint and water immersion stress for 15 days, and resistance to the effect of clomipramine was induced in a behavioral despair paradigm. In the present study, we found that cotreatment with clomipramine and inhalation of Roman chamomile attenuated depression-like behavior in a forced swim test. Next, we examined the hippocampal mRNA levels of two cytokines, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha and interleukin-6 (IL-6); a neurotrophic factor, brain derived-neurotrophic factor (BDNF); and nerve growth factor (NGF). TNF alpha, IL-6 and BDNF mRNA levels did not change in the hippocampus of stressed mice. However, the NGF mRNA level was significantly decreased, and this decrease was not attenuated by treatment with clomipramine or inhalation of Roman chamomile alone. We also examined whether Roman chamomile combined with clomipramine treatment affects hippocampal neurogenesis and serum corticosterone levels. Stressed mice had fewer doublecortin (DCX)-positive cells in the subgranular zone of the dentate gyrus, but this was significantly attenuated by Roman chamomile and clomipramine treatment. In addition, the serum corticosterone level was also significantly decreased by treatment with Roman chamomile and clomipramine. These results suggest that Roman chamomile inhalation may enhance the antidepressant effect of clomipramine by increasing hippocampal neurogenesis and modulating corticosterone levels in patients with treatment-resistant depression.


Assuntos
Comportamento Animal , Chamaemelum/química , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Exposição por Inalação , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Animais , Proliferação de Células/efeitos dos fármacos , Clomipramina/farmacologia , Corticosterona/sangue , Citocinas/genética , Citocinas/metabolismo , Depressão/sangue , Proteína Duplacortina , Quimioterapia Combinada , Hipocampo/efeitos dos fármacos , Hipocampo/metabolismo , Masculino , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Fatores de Crescimento Neural/genética , Fatores de Crescimento Neural/metabolismo , Neurogênese/efeitos dos fármacos , Extratos Vegetais/farmacologia , RNA Mensageiro/genética , RNA Mensageiro/metabolismo , Estresse Psicológico/sangue , Estresse Psicológico/tratamento farmacológico
20.
Riv Psichiatr ; 54(1): 37-39, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30760936

RESUMO

In this paper we present the case of a female teenager patient who was diagnosed with bipolar affective disorder and during psychotropic treatment with risperidone, the prolactin levels ranged between 55 ng/mL and 85 ng/mL at monthly repeated dosing. During this period, the patient presented somatic alterations in her state of health. The patient benefited from brain imaging, which revealed that in sella turcica is distinguished a well-defined and relatively homogeneous formation, measuring approximately 11/8 mm, suggestive of a pituitary adenoma. After changing the antipsychotic treatment, the pituitary formation resolved to a subsequent imaging re-evaluation.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Hiperprolactinemia/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/induzido quimicamente , Prolactinoma/induzido quimicamente , Risperidona/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Bipolar/complicações , Clomipramina/uso terapêutico , Substituição de Medicamentos , Feminino , Haloperidol/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Neuroimagem , Olanzapina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/complicações , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/diagnóstico por imagem , Prolactina/sangue , Prolactinoma/complicações , Prolactinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Indução de Remissão , Risperidona/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...